[Company profile] [Political - Economical services] [Defence - Security services] [Financial - Business services] [News, reports] [Reply Form]
February 2001, The Future of the Democratic Republic of Congo, DRC
The Democratic Republic of Congo
The Democratic Republic of Congo, DRC, the former Zaire, has been a
very turbulent country in the previous years. The country, one of the
largest in Africa, with an abundance of potential with large reserves
of several kind of minerals and an even larger agricultural potential,
has been thrown into a war with many facets. It is an internal
conflict but can be as good described, because of the foreign
involvement in the conflict, as an war between several African
countries. Nearly all neighboring countries are involved in the
conflict and support one of the many sides in the conflict. The war
in the DRC has been called by some as the first African Great War,
and they are right with this statement.
The conflict started rather small as Ugandan and Rwandan forces moved
into the DRC, at that time still Zaire, with the objective to
eliminate violent opposition groups which used the DRC as a homebase.
Several Congolese opposition groups used these actions to start an
insurgency to get rid of the much disliked dictator Sese Seko Mobuto.
The much fractioned opposition could be united with rather dubious
methods, many leaders disappeared, by Laurent Desire Kabila, Kabila
became the new leader of the opposition which had become much more
effective through the unification. With support of the Rwandan and
Ugandan government and military the opposition movement was now able
to take over power and dispose Mobuto.
Kabila became president with high expectations of the Congolese
population, who expected an end to the decayed and rotten Mobuto
government and the economic misery. Unfortunately Kabila was however
not the salvation he promised to be. Kabila simply replaced the
people but not the system and on the shortest possible of time span
he could alineate his former allies, Rwanda and Uganda, by allowing
and even supporting the Ugandan and Rwandan opposition movements in
the DRC and by discriminating the Banyamulenge and other Tutsi
descendants in the east of the country.
The ones united opposition quickly found refuge in the east of the
country and started to fight the new regime in Kinshasa with support
of Uganda and Rwanda. Essentially three major opposition movements
and many more tribal groups came into existence since the second
rebellion started.The three major organisations are the Mouvement
pour la Liberation du Congo, MLC, the Rassemblement Congolais pour la
Democratique-Mouvement Liberation, RCD-ML and the Rassemblement
Congolais pour la Democratique-Goma, RCD-Goma The MLC is supported by
Uganda and the RCD's are supported by Rwanda.
The situation worsened even further as Burundi which is involved in a
some kind of civil war also has some opposition movements operating
out of the DRC became involved in the conflict. Another enemy for
Kabila and an supporter for the rebel movements.
The combined opposition, rebel movements, against Kabila could
conquer large parts of the DRC and nearly the whole eastern side of
the country is under their control. The opposition is however not
united and the contradictions increased in time. The divisions are
not only limited to the MLC, RCD-M and the RCD-Goma which
occassionally combat eachother but also local Ugandan and Rwandan
forces are involved and even fight with eachother. The problems in
the rebel movements increased as all have a stake in the DRC cake and
all want to profit from its mineral wealth.
The opposition in the east is a collection of groups with three large
groups the MLC, RCD-M and the RCD-Goma and many other tribal groups
like the Banyamulenge and small local groups with each a rather
independent warlord. Sometimes they cooperate but mostly they are
outright hostile towards eachother. As mentioned before they are all
primarily interested in getting their share of the wealth in the
country.
Kabila could withstand the opposition only by the large support it
received from its supporters, Angola, Namibia, Zimbabwe and the
Sudan. These countries support Kabila out of their own interests and
certainly not for the good of the DRC.
Angola and Namibia want to limit the operations of the UNITA, which
is combatting the Angolan government in a two decade long civil war
and are creating havoc in Namibia. Zimbabwe is supporting Kabila out
of pure commercial interests as the Zimbabwan political and military
elite received generous exploitation contracts of minerals in the DRC
and they need to be protected. Sudan is supporting Kabila because
Uganda is supporting the Sudanese opposition, the SPLA.
As the war continued with this strange collection of enemies and
supporters, the intense fighting has decreased. The territory hold by
each side has been more or less stabilised. But this does not mean an
end to the fighting which became clear as all peace initiatives
collapsed and no site was really willing to concede and cooperate.
The future of the DRC
The year 2001 started surprisingly, or not, with the succesful
assassination of the president of the DRC, Laurent Desire Kabila. The
strongman in the DRC government who could get together an alliance of
supporters which were willing to support him in the struggle against
the opposition, rebel movements, in the east of the country.
Laurent Desire Kabila was killed, shot, by a bodyguard. It is still
uncertain which organisation is behind the person who killed him.
There are several rumors, conspiracy theories, which are blaming the
rebel forces in the east of the country, or the former political
allies like the CNRD, or see an involvement of Rwanda, Angola and
even the CIA or Belgium as the former colonial ruler. So there is no
certainty at the moment.
The death of Kabila could have large implications for the country.
His death could start a fundamental change in the country as no man
in his government will most likely not be able to control the
government forces and keep the alliance together. The alliance of
supporters are getting more and more problems at home and might be
tempted to witdraw their support. And this would quickly mean the end
of the current government.
The successor of Kabila is at the moment his son Joseph Kabila,
which was already the Chief of Staff of the armed forces. Joseph
Kabila will be the next president but it is uncertain if he will
remain very long president. He has the support of the other cabinet
members, all close friends and appointees of Laurent Desire Kabila,
and the armed forces. But the support is not certain as some stronger
cabinet members and some military commanders do not fully support
Joseph Kabila. Some of them have ambitions of their own for a higher
position, read the presidency.
The opposition parties in Kinshasa like the Democratic Opposition for
Congo, who still believe in a peaceful change to a democratic Congo
and the opposition, rebel, groups in the east do however oppose
Joseph Kabila and are not willing to accept him as the new president.
They will at the moment not use the current situation to actively
fight Joseph Kabila but in the future they certainly will.
The survival of Joseph Kabila depends on the support he can get from
within the government and if the foreign supporters are willing to
continue the support they have been given in the recent years. The
Angolan, Namibian and Zimbabwan support is of the utmost importance
to survive against the political and rebel opposition in the country.
If one or more end their support, withdraw their forces, the chance
of survival of the Kabila government is as good as non-existent.
Momentarily, Angola and Zimbabwe are committed to the alliance and
the artificial stability in the areas they control. They do not have
another option on the very short term. Angola and Zimbawe even
increased the number of forces in the DRC to avoid any resistance,
uprising, in the DRC during the transistion of power and ofcourse to
secure their position.
The Kabila alliance
The three most important supporters as Angola, Zimbabwe and Namibia.
The Kabila government could probably survive the withdrawal of
Namibia but if one of the other two would end the support the end of
the Kabila government is just a matter of time.
The Kabila government is highly dependent on the support of Angola,
considerable Angolan armed forces are deployed in the DRC.
Geographical conditions and the activities of the Angolan forces
stabilised the expansion of the rebel forces, stopped them from
moving further to the west.
The Angolan government was/is however not very satisfied with the
Kabila government as they did not, could not, curtail the activities
of the UNITA in the DRC. The Angolan armed forces do their best to
control the UNITA in the DRC but they are in a sense overstretched.
Operating on two battlefields in the DRC, first, against the rebels
in the east and second, against the UNITA in the west, is to much for
the quantity of forces deployed in Angola. Especially as it gets ever
more difficult to send and maintain the forces in the DRC and at the
same time keep the pressure on the UNITA in Angola proper.
The Angolan government is therefore at the moment busy to reassess
the current situation. It might be more effective to withdraw their
forces from the DRC and instead use them to increase the pressure on
the UNITA in country and to improve the control on the border, e.g.
closing the border.
The Zimbabwan support for the Kabila government is equally important
as they stopped the rebel advance to the south-west. The number of
Zimbabwan armed forces in the DRC is about as large as the Angolan
contribution. Around 14.000 men, including a small number of light
attack aircraft, are deployed in the DRC. These forces are necessary
to protect the Zimbabwan commercial interests in the DRC. The
Zimbabwan involvement is absolutely necessary as if they would
withdraw the rebel movements could win and the Zimbabwan interests would be
lost.
Zimbabwe has however a number of internal problems which could mean
the end of the support towards the DRC. The economy of Zimabawe is
close to bankruptcy and the dissatisfaction in the country is growing
by the day. The people are dissatisfied because of the bad economic
situation and because of the high cost of the involvement, in money
and casualties, in the DRC. The anger is increased because the
Zimbabwan involvement is largely to protect the interests of the
political and military elite of the country, so there are not really
national interests at stake.
The Namibian support for the Kabila government is the smallest of the
three, approximately 2.000 men are deployed in the DRC. The Namibian
armed forces are essentially in support of the Angolan forces. Their
importance is therefore, militarily, small but politically
significant as it is another voice, vote, in favor of the Kabila
government. The Namibian deployment is also less certain as Namibia
is facing some internal problems with UNITA forces crossing into
Namibia and an independent movement, at the moment more or less under
control, in the Caprivi strip.
On the short term all the countries in the Kabila alliance are
willing to continue their support not withstanding de internal
difficulties in these countries. They do so as the other options look
to be less secure and /or profitable.
The Kabila government is pressured to maintain the Angolan and
Zimbabwan support and they will do the utmost to keep that support.
The death of Laurent Desire Kabila will not make it any easier and
the increasing internal problems of all three make the continuation
of the support uncertain and out of control of the Kabila government.
They can do very little than to wait, hope and promiss that the
Kabila government will do everything possible to fulfil the wishes of
Angola and Zimbabwe. The only advantage of the Kabila government is
that Angola and Zimbabwe have already invested so much in the DRC
adventure and have none viable other option on the short term.
The opposition
The oppostion to the Kabila government can be divided in two groups,
the democrats who mostly use peacefull means to introduce change in
the DRC and the more dangerous oppostion, rebel, groups in the east
of the country who are fighting to receive a better position in the
DRC.
The political opposition can be controlled as long as they are unable
to rally massive support in the population. The death of Laurent
Desire Kabila, which was seen at the start as the hero, liberator, of
the Congolese people but turned out to be just like his predecessor
Mobuto with just another name was able to keep the dissatisfied
populaton under control but his son Joseph does not has his father's
fame to do the same and he will be much more busy in keeping his
enemies in the cabinet, army and party under control. There are to
many ambitious people looking at the presidency.
The only advantage of Joseph Kabila is that none of them has the personality
to quickly take over control in the country. It will take some diplomacy and
time for a candidate to get enough support to take over power.
The rumor, true or not true is not important, that Joseph has a Tutsi
mother could be equally damaging for the presidency of Joseph Kabila
as the Tutsis are far from being popular in the DRC. This fact could
be especially benificial for the political opposition to gain support
in the population.
The rebel groups in the east pose however a bigger threat to the
Kabila government as they have the potential to eliminate the Kabila
government. The advantage of the Kabila alliance is that the internal
problems within the rebel groups will weaken the rebel's case and the
strong presence of Angolan and Zimbabwan armed forces will make any
advance of the rebel groups very unlikely but they are still to
strong to be defeated by the Kabila government even with the support
of Angola and Zimbabwe.
A change in the current situation, a defeat of the rebel movements,
is unlikely as Angola and Zimbabwe are not really inclined to support
a large offensive operation in the east as their objectives,
controlling the UNITA and protecting the commercial interests can be
done from the territory they already control.
Future prospects for the DRC
The future of the DRC is very uncertain and everything seems to be
possible. The rebellion in the east of the country, the large
presence of foreign forces on DRC soil, Ugandan, Rwandan, Burundi,
Zimbabwan, Angolan and Namibian armed forces, the political
organisations in Kinshasa, the former allies of Kabila which have
been in one or the other way treated unfair by Kabila in the quest
for power and the power struggle for the position of the presidency
make the country very unstable.
This instability could result in four possible scenarios but this is
dependent on the transition of power in Kinshasa and are highly
dependent on the level of support from Angola and Zimbabwe. These two
countries are the linchpin to the future of the DRC. If they decide
the involvement has become to expensive or it is not viable anymore
it will mean the end as the DRC as we know it today.
Firstly, the situation will remain the same with Joseph Kabila as
president with the support of Angola and Zimbabwe. This will demand
that Joseph Kabila is able to subdue the internal opposition in the
government and the political opposition organisations.
Secondly, Joseph Kabila will be removed from the presidency and
another minister or general is able to receive enough support,
including Angola and Zimbabwe, to continue the battle against the
rebellious east.
Thirdly, the power struggle for the presidency is taking longer, the
infighting increases and the political opposition in Kinshasa can
rally support of the masses.
This will mean the end of the current government, a weakening of the
fight in the east and a reassesment of the support of Angola and
Zimbabwe. Angola and Zimbabwe, considering the internal situation in
Angola and Zimbabwe, would then probably witdraw or they might lessen
the support to the level just enough to protect their own interests.
To continue a fight without any Congolese partners could be very
dangerous and unproductive for Angola and Zimbabwe. The attitude of
the rebel movements in the east and the new president will then be
decisive in the DRC. A military advance from the east or a diplomatic
solution is than possible.
And fourthly, there could be a longer struggle for power in Kinshasa,
Angola and Zimbabwe might withdraw or lessen their support, out of
internal and external considerations, and the rebel movements in the
east start creating three new countries in the territory they
control. This scenario is likely if the rebel organisations in the
east are not able because of the troubles between eachother to
exploit the weakness in Kinshasa, e.g. to advance further to the west
and if the supporters of the rebel movements, Uganda and Rwanda, are
satisfied with their current sphere of influence in the DRC and limit
their support to the rebel organisations.
Which scenario will come through is dependent on the skills of Joseph
Kabila to consolidate his position of on his successor to quickly
take over control and stabilise the situation and for both to
acertain the support of Angola and Zimbabwe.